Google Search Central
AI features and your website
Google says its existing SEO fundamentals remain relevant to AI features. There is no special AI schema or text file required to appear.
Read Google guidanceGEO / AEO FOR US BUSINESSES
We align your entity, pages and evidence so search engines can retrieve, verify and cite your business.
No citation guarantees. No fictional proof. Every recommendation has a visible reason.
THE SHORT ANSWER
Generative Engine Optimization, also called GEO or AEO, improves the sources that AI search systems may use when they build an answer. It starts with the same foundations as strong SEO: crawlable pages, clear entities, useful text, accurate structured data and independent authority. Then it maps those foundations to the questions buyers ask and measures which sources appear. GEO does not create a guaranteed shortcut into an AI answer.
WHAT THE SCOPE CAN INCLUDE
A proposal selects only the lines your business can support with real sources and measurable demand.
Align organization, service, author and location facts across visible copy, metadata and machine-readable markup.
Entity map + contradiction logReview crawling, indexing, canonicals, internal discovery and the pages that should be eligible to appear.
Eligibility audit + prioritized fixesTurn buyer questions into original service, comparison and evidence pages with distinct search intent.
Query-to-source mapMake definitions, decisions and proof easy for people and retrieval systems to locate without hiding the nuance.
Rewritten answer blocksIdentify where independent, relevant corroboration is missing and which real sources could close the gap.
Evidence and distribution planTrack agreed prompts, cited URLs, brand mentions and organic search data without presenting a small sample as certainty.
Baseline + change logPUBLIC GUIDANCE LEDGER
We separate official guidance from emerging conventions and agency opinion.
Google Search Central
Google says its existing SEO fundamentals remain relevant to AI features. There is no special AI schema or text file required to appear.
Read Google guidanceBing Webmaster Tools
Bing now exposes cited pages and citation activity for its AI experiences, giving publishers a concrete measurement surface.
Read Bing guidanceTHE OPERATING ROUTE
Confirm the exact services, entities, pages and buyer questions in scope before changing content.
Fix conflicting facts, weak page intent, crawl barriers and unsupported commercial claims.
Create or improve the pages that can answer a question with specific, reviewable evidence.
Map relevant mentions, listings and references that can support the claims made on your own site.
Repeat the agreed queries, record cited URLs and separate observed movement from inference.
ONE SEARCH SYSTEM, TWO VIEWS
The work overlaps. The difference is what we inspect and how we report the outcome.
MEASUREMENT WITHOUT THEATER
Every baseline records the exact question, surface, date and cited URL. Reports distinguish what was observed from what we infer and what still needs testing.
FAQ
SEO improves how pages are discovered, understood and ranked in search. GEO and AEO focus on how answer systems retrieve, summarize and cite sources. They share technical, content and authority foundations, so GEO should extend a sound SEO program rather than compete with it.
No. Generated answers vary by system, query, location, time and available sources. We can improve eligibility, clarity and authority, then measure agreed queries, but we do not promise a citation or ranking.
No. Google states that its standard SEO requirements and guidance remain relevant for AI features and that no special AI text file or schema markup is required. An llms.txt file can be treated as an optional publishing convention, not as a Google ranking requirement.
We agree on a bounded set of buyer questions and record which brands and URLs appear, alongside search impressions, clicks, referrals and shipped source changes. The report states the sample and its limits so a small test is not presented as market-wide proof.
Coverage is agreed before work begins because access and reporting differ by platform. We only name a platform in the delivery when it is actually tested or measured in that scope.
There is no honest universal timeline. Technical fixes can be shipped quickly, while discovery, recrawling, authority and answer changes depend on the site and the external systems. We set review points around completed work and observable data, not a guaranteed date.
Yes. The engagement can start as an audit and source map, then hand off prioritized technical, editorial and measurement work to your internal team or continue as an implementation scope with YAG US.
START WITH THE SOURCE
Start with a human review of your current sources, search visibility and the questions that matter to your buyers.